> Having a human lifeguard plus an AI that alerts the lifeguard when it spots something suspicious could lead to better outcomes than employing two lifeguards.

> Having a human lifeguard plus an AI that alerts the lifeguard when it spots something suspicious could lead to better outcomes than employing two lifeguards. I disagree. I think you'll see the same thing as with drivers falling asleep while Tesla autopilot is running. The lifeguard will let the computer do all the monitoring since a low false negative rate combined with a low incidence rate means that most bodyguards will experience the computer being 100% reliable for weeks or months at a time. In fact it's not unreasonable that if the lifeguard sees someone drowning but the computer doesn't register it as such the lifeguard may question their own judgement based on experience.