4 ms·
The point is that without a monetary payout at the end, you're going to have trouble incentivizing someone to do the study no matter how cheap it is. And don't
by mark-r 6y ago
The point is that without a monetary payout at the end, you're going to have trouble incentivizing someone to do the study no matter how cheap it is. And don't forget the opposite, if there's a current medical treatment for the condition you're testing they will try to block you at every step.
- TeMPOraL 6y agoYou can pester scientists, they have their own separate set of perverted incentives - academic status - which, in this case, works in your favor. As for the opposite case - if there was a thing you wanted to test that had a strong effect, then the company that owns the current treatment would happily fund you the tests in exchange for dibs if the tests pans out.
- mark-r 6y agoDid you read my GP comment? The dibs don't do you any good unless you can get a patent on the new treatment.
- Talanes 6y agoCountries with socialized healthcare would be well incentivized to fund these studies.
- hnick 6y agoAnd PhD students need to write papers.