6 ms·

We've been working really hard on our startup and now this

86 points by tyohn 18y ago

I'm sure you're aware that its been announced that Google and Yahoo will now be indexing Flash content. Our idea for a startup was to create a search engine for Flash content. For quite some time now we've been crawling and indexing Flash content and we were getting ready to release a beta version of our site. What would you do if you were us? Here's the URL http://mediawombat.com Please beware that we weren't planning on releasing it in this state. This is a very early beta version - before you click on the Image icon or Audio icon please allow the search results page to load completely or use the traditional search link :)

tyohn 18y ago
And we are in process of a re-design. I have to wonder if I should keep working on it...
- babul 18y ago
  Keep going. You don't know what opportunities lie ahead . We make our own "luck" by creating opportunities for "luck" to happen. So until their is a definite reason to stop (such as no more cash), keep going and see what happens.
- maximilian 18y ago
  The cynic in me says your f'ed. You'll definitely have to repurpose because they have much too much inertia. Once flash search results start showing up in my google results, it'll be like, "oh, thats handy". I can't imagine myself using your site just for flash searches.
  - danlester 18y ago
    Actually, I think you're being too generous - I can't see myself using a separate Flash search engine even if Google does NOT also index Flash. As above, you need to think who your target niche really is.
- amohr 18y ago
  You might at least want to get an original logo. I like bluebison.net as much as the next guy, but you should probably have something original if you're going to have a bunch of traffic.
  - scumola 18y ago
    We got permission from bluebison.net and she even offered to make a custom logo for us, but we're waiting to see if the idea is even worth investing money into at this point. We bought a logo off ebay (not suggested) that's on our wiki page of logos: http://mediawombat.com/wiki/index.php/Logos http://mediawombat.com/wiki/index.php/Logos
agentbleu 18y ago
Bugger. I have seen this many a time. But given you have a product launch ready and they are still talking, I would suggest using their might as your opportunity. Right now, I would be scanning the net, anyone posting about Flash I would send them a press release. Just maybe you can get a mention off the topic as its hot right now.
brk 18y ago
I like what you've done so far. Not sure of your funding/day-job(if exists) situation. My first instinct would be to keep going with it. There may be opportunities to use the code as a competitor to Google (at time people thought they too were stupid for reinventing a wheel), or to create something that could be licensed to people to use on their own site for custom content search. There are also SEO opportunities, to crawl a flash-heavy site and dynamically create pages with the same keywords/content that is easier for other search engines to find. You could also expand to other sorts of rich meta-data, like indexing the EXIM data on photos, etc.
brm 18y ago
Yes, keep going. Look at it as a sort of market validation for your product. You've done a lot of work, now look for angles to possibly differentiate yourself. The door has gotten a little harder to get through but it is by no means closed. Who knows, G and Y jumping into the market may make your technology a valuable acquisition for someone else looking to compete in search.
Mistone 18y ago
wow your market just got validated by the major players - this is no reason to stop, you do however need to push forward on a specific niche - this can be seen a major set back or opportunity - likely there is a lot of buzz on this announcement. maybe you can great some adwords adds against the news story keywords and get folks that are excited about this server to try our your site first.
- seekely 18y ago
  Validated by players that are very likely to crush any start-up into oblivion. I wouldn't be too excited ;).
  - icey 18y ago
    I had this happen to me with my last startup right around the time we were dealing with some angel investors. Every single of one of them called me to say "Well, Microsoft is going to be doing this now, we don't want to throw our money away." It's one thing to have market validation by companies you could theoretically catch up to; it's an entirely different beast to try to compete with Google or Microsoft.
    - trominos 18y ago
      I thought that the entire startup culture was based on the idea that a startup could outpace a behemoth like Google or Microsoft.
      - seekely 18y ago
        I think in many cases outpacing the big players might be true, especially when the big players are known for mucking new pursuits up, but in this particular case, the startup is trying to take on niche functionality of search which Google is already very established and very good at. The odds Google mucks up flash indexing are practically nill.
        18y ago
tectonic 18y ago
Consider licensing your search tech to companies not blessed by Adobe? (I.e., other than Google / Yahoo!) I know my company would be interested.
- tyohn 18y ago
  Sure, we'd be very interested.
  - prakash 18y ago
    Congrats on the idea! Now do the same for Silverlight and sell the company to msft. btw: I like the part about Investors on you website :-)
    - DaniFong 18y ago
      Would you need to sell Silverlight indexing to msft?
      - prakash 18y ago
        As long as they don't buy Yahoo, you don't need to sell msft anything, they will buy it, so you are right :-) In fact VC's should start a fund, similar to Iphone apps fund, called "msft not buying yahoo, so lets make them use that 44 billion" fund ;-)
  - aaronblohowiak 18y ago
    Notice that what they are suggesting is the key component of your solution (taking links from a page and producing the parts to index) not the indexing itself or the search term parsing &c. I think if you offered that aspect (as a web server or licensed, shared-source software) then you could carve out a good nice whithout having to rebuild the rest of the "search" infrastructure. Basicly, I am suggesting that you forget about "Our search results are not very good right now. We are in the very early startup phase of our website. The crawler has only been crawling for a while, we only have crawled a handfull of websites, and our search query technology is only in the keyword phase. All of these things require time and money to implement. As things progress we'll improve our infrastructure and ramp-up as quickly as we can." and focus on what you are apparently good at.
DenisM 18y ago
The rest of us should consider wether we're writing a feature for someone else's product, or if what we do can stand by itself.
tstegart 18y ago
You've done a lot of work, so don't think its worthless just because someone else jumped in. But you need to strategize and think about all the ways this will affect you. What was your monetization strategy in the first place? You may need to change it to account for the new development. Maybe you'll license your code instead, or come up with something new. But don't just give up without at least thinking long and hard about what your business can do. You should also research what Google, Yahoo and Adobe (hey, where's MSFT?) have ACTUALLY done, not just said they will do. You may have an opportunity there as well.
asimjalis 18y ago
Why not contact Google and Yahoo and see if they are interested in acquiring you? It couldn't hurt. Also this is perhaps the downside of waiting too long to launch. Can you rescope this thing and release it sooner? Could you release a flimsy version 1 right now and then improve it and flesh it out over the next few months? Don't worry about solving technological problems that you don't have yet. Solve them when you have them. I realize Twitter might sound like a counter-example to this line of thinking. But think about it. Imagine if Twitter had not released and was still working on their perfect architecture. Would they even know what the real problems were going to be? They might have squandered their time on non-problems. Plus, no one would know or care about them. So in retrospect, releasing their flimsy app was probably the best thing that they did.
- herdrick 18y ago
  > Why not contact Google and Yahoo and see if they > are interested in acquiring you? It couldn't hurt. You should never do this. When buying or selling something illiquid, the side who brings up the idea of a deal starts off at a disadvantage. So if you make the overture you will get hosed. Except you won't even get that in this case, as an offer like that coming in over the transom to a big company is never going to reach anyone who matters. But your other advice is good.
scumola 18y ago
Hi there. I'm the other founder of the site (Troy made the original post on this thread) and I sent a "Hey, we're doing that too" email to the VP of Yahoo search and the VP of Google search this morning regarding SWF search. Still haven't heard anything back from them as of this post though. Also, we were denied VC funding earlier this year for this same project. Does anyone think that now is a good time to re-submit to the VC group and ask for a second chance while there's a buzz? :) - Steve Webb ( http://mediawombat.com http://mediawombat.com - http://badcheese.com http://badcheese.com )
- gojomo 18y ago
  Can you make the case that your solution is better than what Adobe and Yahoo or Google engineers have put together? (If not, I'm not sure why you're mailing companies already strategically linked with Adobe's solution.) I wouldn't count on Adobe limiting access to this special player to just Google and Yahoo. Adobe wants Flash/Flex accessible by all crawlers, so it's just a matter of time.
  - scumola 18y ago
    I won't know what they put together - as far as I know, there's nothing concrete on the Google or Yahoo end, but you know PR - just being in talks with Adobe gives the PR department to promise a product. It's also very possible that we could easily get squashed in a very short time. Mainly, I just wanted to open the communication channels with G and Y to see if they bite or even acknowledge us.
- webwright 18y ago
  You were denied funding? "The VC group"? How many times were you told no by how many investors? The way you said it makes it look like you talked to 1 firm and then stopped. Fundraising is a process-- not a single ask. Expect to have 1 person pitching, largely full-time, for 3-9 months to tons of different investors. But to be honest-- a VC firm isn't going to touch a company with no traction except in the rare event that the founders have an unusual amount of credibility. You'd really be better off with angels. Though (on the surface), I don't think you'll get buyoff from ANY investors unless you can prove there's a business there. In your shoes I wouldn't talk to investors until I had a proven growth rate and 10-20k uniques per day. I'm going to disagree with the people saying, "oooh, market validation". This validates that Google wants to index more stuff and Flash builders want to get indexed. It doesn't validate that users would go to a vertical flash search engine. When Google does something in the search game, they are generally going to win. Without the exit strategy of selling to them, you are left with building your own search brand (supported by ads). Are there enough people who are passionate about finding Flash stuff that they'd rather use your (better) flash search engine over an integrated experience at Google?
rdj 18y ago
I would license the technology. In my industry crawlers are required to perform a sweep and gather data. However, there is a large void in the flash crawling capabilities of various tools. Look for tools that crawl, index, data mine, whatever and see if there are opportunities to provide the flash crawling component through an API license of sorts.
omnipath 18y ago
Shout to the world what you're working on right now. Now that the information is out there that what you're doing is worth doing, a lot of the media work is already done for you. Call tech mags and blogs and let them know you're already working on something that Adobe just announced, even if it's in beta. And if you can, even show off the beta so that people and the media can quickly give you feedback, thus improving your site/software at a faster rate. Good luck.
mattmaroon 18y ago
I wouldn't sweat it too much just yet. You don't know when/how Google and Yahoo will add this into their results, and until you launch, find customers, and start iterating, you don't know exactly where you'll end up yourself. You might find yourself not competing with Google head on after all.
deleted 18y ago
[deleted]
jm4 18y ago
I imagine that you had to have known this would happen sooner or later so my advice would be not to sweat it too much. You decided to enter a niche market that was basically only a niche market because the major players had chosen to overlook it. At any time they had the resources available to move in and you can bet that if you had become popular they would have come along to eat your lunch. If anything, this may even put you in a better position because now you've really got a fire under your ass to do something to separate your product from theirs. There's also the possibility that if you garner enough attention you'll be acquired. P.S. Very neat search engine. I especially like the ActionScript view.
danlester 18y ago
This sounds like a sensible feature for Google or Yahoo, but you need to think about who would really need to search Flash content - as you suggest on your site, perhaps the Flash Developer community is your likely audience. So do deals with sites involving that. The point is that very few general users are going to give up on Google results and think "I wonder if what I'm looking for happens to be in a Flash file somewhere". Of course, if it's thrown in for free with Google results then it might be used by general users, but not on its own. And there are plenty of other new directions that people have suggested for your technology. Probably the best to see a return on your investment so far would be to provide precisely the feature that Google have announced to the second tier of search engines.
Kaizyn 18y ago
That's good and that's bad. It's bad because it means you'll have to move much faster to get your site out the door. It's good because then that makes your site much more valuable as an acquisition for one of the large search engines that falls behind the leader in this space. Specifically, I would target trying to be acquired by Microsoft, Ask.com, or A9. Don't be intimidated by Google and Yahoo! as they're both trying to juggle too many balls in the air at the moment to design something that does a great job at dealing with this specific type of web content. If your service is done well, I really don't think you'll have any problem with the acquition.
coltafever 18y ago
Ouch. I feel your pain. It's probably too late to help much but when I look at product initiatives my first criteria to do something that is never going to show up on the shelves at Wal Mart and that none of the big boys like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Apple, etc. would ever consider doing.
gojomo 18y ago
There are also open-source projects for reading (and thus finding the text and links inside) SWF files -- see Gnash, JavaSWF, and others. So there's a practical cap on how much other crawl/search teams would pay for such technology, unless you've got something really advanced.
Alex3917 18y ago
The vast majority of niche file types are currently not indexed by Google. Even though these file types make up only a fraction of a percent of what people are looking for, if you were able to create a search engine that covered a wide variety of these then there might be some opportunity. For example, if your search engine can index .sfg files (for Go players), .mm files (mind maps), etc.
Maro 18y ago
There have been many occasions when the large players like MS or Google announced something and nothing usable came of it: e.g. OpenSocial is mostly vaporware. Also, Google AND Yahoo, i.e. two huge corporations working together raises flags for me. When's the last time that worked out? There'll be a lot of managarial communication, overhead, bureaucracy, stupidity, etc. Assuming they really are doing this together: having worked at large corporations and knowing how inefficient even internal management is, I actually wouldn't worry too much about this.
ashleyw 18y ago
I must admit I wouldn't be using your search when Google has flash search support. But as you can see below, licensing your technology to other companies would be a big step. If only you had it launched 6 months ago you would be in a better situation by now, but I see now evidence to say your a dead startup if your claims stand up! ;)
PieSquared 18y ago
It says you'd be open to other names, so here's my suggestion: flashiefind. It describes what you're doing, has a sort of alliteration and ring to it, and feels natural. And the domain name is open. Eh?
maxklein 18y ago
Well, how about making categories: Flash games, Flash tools, stuff like that. Just change your focus a bit, but keep your technology.
ideamonk 18y ago
no result for the query 'sex' , what more should I expect from it. It should show me some flash animations over that!
- tyohn 18y ago
  look for body parts ;)
- scumola 18y ago
  Yea, 'sex' is actually a popular query, but for some reason, none of the SWF files that we've indexed contain the string 'sex'. Believe me, there are plenty of porn-related SWF files out there, so the material is not lacking, just categorizing the data is something that needs to be done.
jaycee 18y ago
John Gruber of Daring Fireball (http://daringfireball.net http://daringfireball.net) grumbled today about the closed nature of Adobe/Google/Yahoo's methodology on this one. Which means there's surely an opportunity to appeal to everyone who prefers openness in their web--and that's a lot of people. Go for it.
sabat 18y ago
Figure out the sort of thing that Google and Yahoo don't or won't do, and do that. Exactly. There has to be an approach or angle on this data that Google isn't doing -- maybe they wouldn't think to do it, or maybe they'd just find it anathema.
LPTS 18y ago
That totally sucks for you. How much money/time did you sink into this, and do you have investors yet?
- scumola 18y ago
  We initially put about 5 days (2 people working almost 24 hours a day it seemed) into getting the concept from paper to a working site in time to make a deadline for a VC funding submission (which we didn't get). The crawler, ripper, indexer, DB and the website have been tweaked almost daily over the last 6 months or so. The interface is under a re-design and so is most of the back-end (crawling needs to be done better, uploading to S3). It all runs on 2 linux machines and ripped data is stored on Amazon's S3 service. So-far the only money that we put into it ourselves is $20 for a logo off ebay that we're not even using and the S3 charges, which are about $20/mo at this point. Other hardware and bandwidth is just our own personal machines and internet connections, so that's 'free'. :) We don't have any investors. See our Investors page: http://mediawombat.com/wiki/index.php/Investors http://mediawombat.com/wiki/index.php/Investors
christefano 18y ago
Believe me when I say I understand your situation (Apple did something similar to my flagship product in 1998) but I have to ask... Didn't you know that Adobe has been working with Google on this? I learned about it at a Flex conference in March.
- tyohn 18y ago
  Well, I guess I don't get out enough :) But I remember reading something about Adobe opening up the .SWF format but we were already crawling and indexing when I read about it.
  - Tichy 18y ago
    Still, it can't have been a complete surprise that Google wants to crawl Flash. They crawl lots of other file formats, so if you can manage to crawl flash, what made you think Google wouldn't be able to? Maybe you could still survive as a specialized flash search engine? With Google, you get just everything lumped together, at your site, I know I am only searching flash.
vaksel 18y ago
why is everyone so quick to roll over the second one of the big boys enter your area? Did you really expect your site to stay unique? Its not like those big companies had vast amounts of success outside their core ventures. Even Google the internet behemoth, has had very few #1-#2 products, most of their products are pretty average. And lets not even talk about Yahoo. You want to know how the Google version of your product will look like? They'll probably just add a "Flash" link under "more v", and that's it, you'll be able to search flash but it'll be hidden a few clicks away, where 99.9999% of users will never see it. So it'll have its 15 seconds of fame on Techcrunch and the blogosphere and then it'll go away. So you can compete just fine. I would change the site around so it looks a little bit more like a content site. i.e. try something along the lines of youtube, where you show some featured search results for video/games. And I'd come up with some tag line that basically tells any person that comes to your site right away, that THIS is the place where they can find any flash game/video on the net. You need to look at flash search as a niche. And niches is the place where big boys have constantly gotten their asses kicked by the 1-2 man start-ups. Plenty of people competed with Google, survived, and were bought out by them. So why not you? So instead of moping that you finally have competition, look at Google's attempt at your technology, figure out how you can differentiate, and then add the few features that they missed.
- blinks 18y ago
  > They'll probably just add a "Flash" link under "more v", and that's it,... Just like they do with PDFs? /sarcasm
NonEUCitizen 18y ago
Opensource it and make it part of Lucene? then ask Index Ventures (pun NOT intended -- Index invested in MySQL) to invest?
sutro 18y ago
Google/Yahoo/Adobe did you a favor. Dump the consumer-facing site and business model and reposition yourself as an enterprise software business, which will greatly increase your chances of monetizing this. Sell it to Autonomy or one of its competitors, or perhaps to one of the enterprise content vendors like Vignette and their ilk. I'm sure a little research would reveal other such opportunities. Take a look at this company: http://www.ephox.com http://www.ephox.com. It sells a WYSIWYG web content editor. Those things are a dime a dozen on sourceforge. They probably wouldn't cover their own hosting fees if they tried to sell a consumer/developer-facing version. So they have wisely embedded themselves with enterprise software vendors and are doing quite well for themselves as a result. Transform your company into an Ephox. Forget all the consumer-facing Web 2.0 BS you read about on HN and TechCrunch and focus your time and energy where the real money is: in corporate IT.
pi3832 18y ago
Flashblock is a popular add-on for Firefox. I would recommend a button on your page that adds your site to the Flashblock "allowed" list.
- scumola 18y ago
  Yea, I use flashblock myself. I'm of the mind of making a non-flash front-end just because it's not very light-weight. Javascript and CSS could provide the same experience without the weight of the flash interface, but it kinda makes sense to display flash guts in a flash container, doesn't it? :)
livecrunch 18y ago
Name does not tell me anything, Get your site SEO Make a point of your startup , text you wrote is too small and does not make any sense what website is about. Speedup your search and make the boxes smaller they are loading to slow due to images etc Do some advertising Overall not bad.
aspirant 18y ago
Keep going, but take time to imagine a world where flash-search is commonplace. What will the world need then? What will Google need then? If nothing else, the work you've done puts you in a better place to answer that question than almost anyone.
scumola 18y ago
Hey, I'd just like to thank everyone for helping out and providing your comments and suggestions about our project. We got a lot of exposure just from this YC post and we're starting to shake hands with people who have offered assistance. None of this wouldn't have happened without the help and support of the YC community. Thanks!
ltbarcly 18y ago
This is a bad idea for a startup. Anyone can run 'strings' on a flash file and index it. And your website isn't very good either. So all in all, I would say you should spend your time doing something that would take more than 20 minutes to copy. (Look up "barriers to entry")
pjackson 18y ago
YouTube didn't give up because Google launched Google Video. And as it turns out YouTube did it better and sold to Google. Press on!

86 points by tyohn 18y ago

tyohn 18y ago

And we are in process of a re-design. I have to wonder if I should keep working on it...

babul 18y ago
Keep going. You don't know what opportunities lie ahead . We make our own "luck" by creating opportunities for "luck" to happen. So until their is a definite reason to stop (such as no more cash), keep going and see what happens.
maximilian 18y ago
The cynic in me says your f'ed. You'll definitely have to repurpose because they have much too much inertia. Once flash search results start showing up in my google results, it'll be like, "oh, thats handy". I can't imagine myself using your site just for flash searches.
- danlester 18y ago
  Actually, I think you're being too generous - I can't see myself using a separate Flash search engine even if Google does NOT also index Flash. As above, you need to think who your target niche really is.
amohr 18y ago
You might at least want to get an original logo. I like bluebison.net as much as the next guy, but you should probably have something original if you're going to have a bunch of traffic.
- scumola 18y ago
  We got permission from bluebison.net and she even offered to make a custom logo for us, but we're waiting to see if the idea is even worth investing money into at this point. We bought a logo off ebay (not suggested) that's on our wiki page of logos: http://mediawombat.com/wiki/index.php/Logos http://mediawombat.com/wiki/index.php/Logos

agentbleu 18y ago

Bugger. I have seen this many a time. But given you have a product launch ready and they are still talking, I would suggest using their might as your opportunity. Right now, I would be scanning the net, anyone posting about Flash I would send them a press release. Just maybe you can get a mention off the topic as its hot right now.

brk 18y ago

I like what you've done so far. Not sure of your funding/day-job(if exists) situation. My first instinct would be to keep going with it. There may be opportunities to use the code as a competitor to Google (at time people thought they too were stupid for reinventing a wheel), or to create something that could be licensed to people to use on their own site for custom content search. There are also SEO opportunities, to crawl a flash-heavy site and dynamically create pages with the same keywords/content that is easier for other search engines to find. You could also expand to other sorts of rich meta-data, like indexing the EXIM data on photos, etc.

brm 18y ago

Yes, keep going. Look at it as a sort of market validation for your product. You've done a lot of work, now look for angles to possibly differentiate yourself. The door has gotten a little harder to get through but it is by no means closed. Who knows, G and Y jumping into the market may make your technology a valuable acquisition for someone else looking to compete in search.

Mistone 18y ago

wow your market just got validated by the major players - this is no reason to stop, you do however need to push forward on a specific niche - this can be seen a major set back or opportunity - likely there is a lot of buzz on this announcement. maybe you can great some adwords adds against the news story keywords and get folks that are excited about this server to try our your site first.

seekely 18y ago
Validated by players that are very likely to crush any start-up into oblivion. I wouldn't be too excited ;).
- icey 18y ago
  I had this happen to me with my last startup right around the time we were dealing with some angel investors. Every single of one of them called me to say "Well, Microsoft is going to be doing this now, we don't want to throw our money away." It's one thing to have market validation by companies you could theoretically catch up to; it's an entirely different beast to try to compete with Google or Microsoft.
  - trominos 18y ago
    I thought that the entire startup culture was based on the idea that a startup could outpace a behemoth like Google or Microsoft.
    - seekely 18y ago
      I think in many cases outpacing the big players might be true, especially when the big players are known for mucking new pursuits up, but in this particular case, the startup is trying to take on niche functionality of search which Google is already very established and very good at. The odds Google mucks up flash indexing are practically nill.
      - 18y ago

tectonic 18y ago

Consider licensing your search tech to companies not blessed by Adobe? (I.e., other than Google / Yahoo!) I know my company would be interested.

tyohn 18y ago
Sure, we'd be very interested.
- prakash 18y ago
  Congrats on the idea! Now do the same for Silverlight and sell the company to msft. btw: I like the part about Investors on you website :-)
  - DaniFong 18y ago
    Would you need to sell Silverlight indexing to msft?
    - prakash 18y ago
      As long as they don't buy Yahoo, you don't need to sell msft anything, they will buy it, so you are right :-) In fact VC's should start a fund, similar to Iphone apps fund, called "msft not buying yahoo, so lets make them use that 44 billion" fund ;-)
- aaronblohowiak 18y ago
  Notice that what they are suggesting is the key component of your solution (taking links from a page and producing the parts to index) not the indexing itself or the search term parsing &c. I think if you offered that aspect (as a web server or licensed, shared-source software) then you could carve out a good nice whithout having to rebuild the rest of the "search" infrastructure. Basicly, I am suggesting that you forget about "Our search results are not very good right now. We are in the very early startup phase of our website. The crawler has only been crawling for a while, we only have crawled a handfull of websites, and our search query technology is only in the keyword phase. All of these things require time and money to implement. As things progress we'll improve our infrastructure and ramp-up as quickly as we can." and focus on what you are apparently good at.

DenisM 18y ago

The rest of us should consider wether we're writing a feature for someone else's product, or if what we do can stand by itself.

tstegart 18y ago

You've done a lot of work, so don't think its worthless just because someone else jumped in. But you need to strategize and think about all the ways this will affect you. What was your monetization strategy in the first place? You may need to change it to account for the new development. Maybe you'll license your code instead, or come up with something new. But don't just give up without at least thinking long and hard about what your business can do. You should also research what Google, Yahoo and Adobe (hey, where's MSFT?) have ACTUALLY done, not just said they will do. You may have an opportunity there as well.

asimjalis 18y ago

Why not contact Google and Yahoo and see if they are interested in acquiring you? It couldn't hurt. Also this is perhaps the downside of waiting too long to launch. Can you rescope this thing and release it sooner? Could you release a flimsy version 1 right now and then improve it and flesh it out over the next few months? Don't worry about solving technological problems that you don't have yet. Solve them when you have them. I realize Twitter might sound like a counter-example to this line of thinking. But think about it. Imagine if Twitter had not released and was still working on their perfect architecture. Would they even know what the real problems were going to be? They might have squandered their time on non-problems. Plus, no one would know or care about them. So in retrospect, releasing their flimsy app was probably the best thing that they did.

herdrick 18y ago
> Why not contact Google and Yahoo and see if they > are interested in acquiring you? It couldn't hurt. You should never do this. When buying or selling something illiquid, the side who brings up the idea of a deal starts off at a disadvantage. So if you make the overture you will get hosed. Except you won't even get that in this case, as an offer like that coming in over the transom to a big company is never going to reach anyone who matters. But your other advice is good.

scumola 18y ago

Hi there. I'm the other founder of the site (Troy made the original post on this thread) and I sent a "Hey, we're doing that too" email to the VP of Yahoo search and the VP of Google search this morning regarding SWF search. Still haven't heard anything back from them as of this post though. Also, we were denied VC funding earlier this year for this same project. Does anyone think that now is a good time to re-submit to the VC group and ask for a second chance while there's a buzz? :) - Steve Webb ( http://mediawombat.com http://mediawombat.com - http://badcheese.com http://badcheese.com )

gojomo 18y ago
Can you make the case that your solution is better than what Adobe and Yahoo or Google engineers have put together? (If not, I'm not sure why you're mailing companies already strategically linked with Adobe's solution.) I wouldn't count on Adobe limiting access to this special player to just Google and Yahoo. Adobe wants Flash/Flex accessible by all crawlers, so it's just a matter of time.
- scumola 18y ago
  I won't know what they put together - as far as I know, there's nothing concrete on the Google or Yahoo end, but you know PR - just being in talks with Adobe gives the PR department to promise a product. It's also very possible that we could easily get squashed in a very short time. Mainly, I just wanted to open the communication channels with G and Y to see if they bite or even acknowledge us.
webwright 18y ago
You were denied funding? "The VC group"? How many times were you told no by how many investors? The way you said it makes it look like you talked to 1 firm and then stopped. Fundraising is a process-- not a single ask. Expect to have 1 person pitching, largely full-time, for 3-9 months to tons of different investors. But to be honest-- a VC firm isn't going to touch a company with no traction except in the rare event that the founders have an unusual amount of credibility. You'd really be better off with angels. Though (on the surface), I don't think you'll get buyoff from ANY investors unless you can prove there's a business there. In your shoes I wouldn't talk to investors until I had a proven growth rate and 10-20k uniques per day. I'm going to disagree with the people saying, "oooh, market validation". This validates that Google wants to index more stuff and Flash builders want to get indexed. It doesn't validate that users would go to a vertical flash search engine. When Google does something in the search game, they are generally going to win. Without the exit strategy of selling to them, you are left with building your own search brand (supported by ads). Are there enough people who are passionate about finding Flash stuff that they'd rather use your (better) flash search engine over an integrated experience at Google?

rdj 18y ago

I would license the technology. In my industry crawlers are required to perform a sweep and gather data. However, there is a large void in the flash crawling capabilities of various tools. Look for tools that crawl, index, data mine, whatever and see if there are opportunities to provide the flash crawling component through an API license of sorts.

omnipath 18y ago

Shout to the world what you're working on right now. Now that the information is out there that what you're doing is worth doing, a lot of the media work is already done for you. Call tech mags and blogs and let them know you're already working on something that Adobe just announced, even if it's in beta. And if you can, even show off the beta so that people and the media can quickly give you feedback, thus improving your site/software at a faster rate. Good luck.

mattmaroon 18y ago

I wouldn't sweat it too much just yet. You don't know when/how Google and Yahoo will add this into their results, and until you launch, find customers, and start iterating, you don't know exactly where you'll end up yourself. You might find yourself not competing with Google head on after all.

deleted 18y ago

[deleted]

jm4 18y ago

I imagine that you had to have known this would happen sooner or later so my advice would be not to sweat it too much. You decided to enter a niche market that was basically only a niche market because the major players had chosen to overlook it. At any time they had the resources available to move in and you can bet that if you had become popular they would have come along to eat your lunch. If anything, this may even put you in a better position because now you've really got a fire under your ass to do something to separate your product from theirs. There's also the possibility that if you garner enough attention you'll be acquired. P.S. Very neat search engine. I especially like the ActionScript view.

danlester 18y ago

This sounds like a sensible feature for Google or Yahoo, but you need to think about who would really need to search Flash content - as you suggest on your site, perhaps the Flash Developer community is your likely audience. So do deals with sites involving that. The point is that very few general users are going to give up on Google results and think "I wonder if what I'm looking for happens to be in a Flash file somewhere". Of course, if it's thrown in for free with Google results then it might be used by general users, but not on its own. And there are plenty of other new directions that people have suggested for your technology. Probably the best to see a return on your investment so far would be to provide precisely the feature that Google have announced to the second tier of search engines.

Kaizyn 18y ago

That's good and that's bad. It's bad because it means you'll have to move much faster to get your site out the door. It's good because then that makes your site much more valuable as an acquisition for one of the large search engines that falls behind the leader in this space. Specifically, I would target trying to be acquired by Microsoft, Ask.com, or A9. Don't be intimidated by Google and Yahoo! as they're both trying to juggle too many balls in the air at the moment to design something that does a great job at dealing with this specific type of web content. If your service is done well, I really don't think you'll have any problem with the acquition.

coltafever 18y ago

Ouch. I feel your pain. It's probably too late to help much but when I look at product initiatives my first criteria to do something that is never going to show up on the shelves at Wal Mart and that none of the big boys like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Apple, etc. would ever consider doing.

gojomo 18y ago

There are also open-source projects for reading (and thus finding the text and links inside) SWF files -- see Gnash, JavaSWF, and others. So there's a practical cap on how much other crawl/search teams would pay for such technology, unless you've got something really advanced.

Alex3917 18y ago

The vast majority of niche file types are currently not indexed by Google. Even though these file types make up only a fraction of a percent of what people are looking for, if you were able to create a search engine that covered a wide variety of these then there might be some opportunity. For example, if your search engine can index .sfg files (for Go players), .mm files (mind maps), etc.

Maro 18y ago

There have been many occasions when the large players like MS or Google announced something and nothing usable came of it: e.g. OpenSocial is mostly vaporware. Also, Google AND Yahoo, i.e. two huge corporations working together raises flags for me. When's the last time that worked out? There'll be a lot of managarial communication, overhead, bureaucracy, stupidity, etc. Assuming they really are doing this together: having worked at large corporations and knowing how inefficient even internal management is, I actually wouldn't worry too much about this.

ashleyw 18y ago

I must admit I wouldn't be using your search when Google has flash search support. But as you can see below, licensing your technology to other companies would be a big step. If only you had it launched 6 months ago you would be in a better situation by now, but I see now evidence to say your a dead startup if your claims stand up! ;)

PieSquared 18y ago

It says you'd be open to other names, so here's my suggestion: flashiefind. It describes what you're doing, has a sort of alliteration and ring to it, and feels natural. And the domain name is open. Eh?

maxklein 18y ago

Well, how about making categories: Flash games, Flash tools, stuff like that. Just change your focus a bit, but keep your technology.

ideamonk 18y ago

no result for the query 'sex' , what more should I expect from it. It should show me some flash animations over that!

tyohn 18y ago
look for body parts ;)
scumola 18y ago
Yea, 'sex' is actually a popular query, but for some reason, none of the SWF files that we've indexed contain the string 'sex'. Believe me, there are plenty of porn-related SWF files out there, so the material is not lacking, just categorizing the data is something that needs to be done.

jaycee 18y ago

John Gruber of Daring Fireball (http://daringfireball.net http://daringfireball.net) grumbled today about the closed nature of Adobe/Google/Yahoo's methodology on this one. Which means there's surely an opportunity to appeal to everyone who prefers openness in their web--and that's a lot of people. Go for it.

sabat 18y ago

Figure out the sort of thing that Google and Yahoo don't or won't do, and do that. Exactly. There has to be an approach or angle on this data that Google isn't doing -- maybe they wouldn't think to do it, or maybe they'd just find it anathema.

LPTS 18y ago

That totally sucks for you. How much money/time did you sink into this, and do you have investors yet?

scumola 18y ago
We initially put about 5 days (2 people working almost 24 hours a day it seemed) into getting the concept from paper to a working site in time to make a deadline for a VC funding submission (which we didn't get). The crawler, ripper, indexer, DB and the website have been tweaked almost daily over the last 6 months or so. The interface is under a re-design and so is most of the back-end (crawling needs to be done better, uploading to S3). It all runs on 2 linux machines and ripped data is stored on Amazon's S3 service. So-far the only money that we put into it ourselves is $20 for a logo off ebay that we're not even using and the S3 charges, which are about $20/mo at this point. Other hardware and bandwidth is just our own personal machines and internet connections, so that's 'free'. :) We don't have any investors. See our Investors page: http://mediawombat.com/wiki/index.php/Investors http://mediawombat.com/wiki/index.php/Investors

christefano 18y ago

Believe me when I say I understand your situation (Apple did something similar to my flagship product in 1998) but I have to ask... Didn't you know that Adobe has been working with Google on this? I learned about it at a Flex conference in March.

tyohn 18y ago
Well, I guess I don't get out enough :) But I remember reading something about Adobe opening up the .SWF format but we were already crawling and indexing when I read about it.
- Tichy 18y ago
  Still, it can't have been a complete surprise that Google wants to crawl Flash. They crawl lots of other file formats, so if you can manage to crawl flash, what made you think Google wouldn't be able to? Maybe you could still survive as a specialized flash search engine? With Google, you get just everything lumped together, at your site, I know I am only searching flash.

vaksel 18y ago

why is everyone so quick to roll over the second one of the big boys enter your area? Did you really expect your site to stay unique? Its not like those big companies had vast amounts of success outside their core ventures. Even Google the internet behemoth, has had very few #1-#2 products, most of their products are pretty average. And lets not even talk about Yahoo. You want to know how the Google version of your product will look like? They'll probably just add a "Flash" link under "more v", and that's it, you'll be able to search flash but it'll be hidden a few clicks away, where 99.9999% of users will never see it. So it'll have its 15 seconds of fame on Techcrunch and the blogosphere and then it'll go away. So you can compete just fine. I would change the site around so it looks a little bit more like a content site. i.e. try something along the lines of youtube, where you show some featured search results for video/games. And I'd come up with some tag line that basically tells any person that comes to your site right away, that THIS is the place where they can find any flash game/video on the net. You need to look at flash search as a niche. And niches is the place where big boys have constantly gotten their asses kicked by the 1-2 man start-ups. Plenty of people competed with Google, survived, and were bought out by them. So why not you? So instead of moping that you finally have competition, look at Google's attempt at your technology, figure out how you can differentiate, and then add the few features that they missed.

blinks 18y ago
> They'll probably just add a "Flash" link under "more v", and that's it,... Just like they do with PDFs? /sarcasm

NonEUCitizen 18y ago

Opensource it and make it part of Lucene? then ask Index Ventures (pun NOT intended -- Index invested in MySQL) to invest?

sutro 18y ago

Google/Yahoo/Adobe did you a favor. Dump the consumer-facing site and business model and reposition yourself as an enterprise software business, which will greatly increase your chances of monetizing this. Sell it to Autonomy or one of its competitors, or perhaps to one of the enterprise content vendors like Vignette and their ilk. I'm sure a little research would reveal other such opportunities. Take a look at this company: http://www.ephox.com http://www.ephox.com. It sells a WYSIWYG web content editor. Those things are a dime a dozen on sourceforge. They probably wouldn't cover their own hosting fees if they tried to sell a consumer/developer-facing version. So they have wisely embedded themselves with enterprise software vendors and are doing quite well for themselves as a result. Transform your company into an Ephox. Forget all the consumer-facing Web 2.0 BS you read about on HN and TechCrunch and focus your time and energy where the real money is: in corporate IT.

pi3832 18y ago

Flashblock is a popular add-on for Firefox. I would recommend a button on your page that adds your site to the Flashblock "allowed" list.

scumola 18y ago
Yea, I use flashblock myself. I'm of the mind of making a non-flash front-end just because it's not very light-weight. Javascript and CSS could provide the same experience without the weight of the flash interface, but it kinda makes sense to display flash guts in a flash container, doesn't it? :)

livecrunch 18y ago

Name does not tell me anything, Get your site SEO Make a point of your startup , text you wrote is too small and does not make any sense what website is about. Speedup your search and make the boxes smaller they are loading to slow due to images etc Do some advertising Overall not bad.

aspirant 18y ago

Keep going, but take time to imagine a world where flash-search is commonplace. What will the world need then? What will Google need then? If nothing else, the work you've done puts you in a better place to answer that question than almost anyone.

scumola 18y ago

Hey, I'd just like to thank everyone for helping out and providing your comments and suggestions about our project. We got a lot of exposure just from this YC post and we're starting to shake hands with people who have offered assistance. None of this wouldn't have happened without the help and support of the YC community. Thanks!

ltbarcly 18y ago

This is a bad idea for a startup. Anyone can run 'strings' on a flash file and index it. And your website isn't very good either. So all in all, I would say you should spend your time doing something that would take more than 20 minutes to copy. (Look up "barriers to entry")

pjackson 18y ago

YouTube didn't give up because Google launched Google Video. And as it turns out YouTube did it better and sold to Google. Press on!