Agree. We do something similar: * 1 month (or less) to prove that it makes sense to continue. We do start out with a pretty well defined problem definition tho

Agree. We do something similar: * 1 month (or less) to prove that it makes sense to continue. We do start out with a pretty well defined problem definition though. Outcome is typically a bunch of jupyter notebooks proving that we get at least some predictive value that helps solve the problem. If no proof: no-go * 2 months to upgrade it to something that works well enough to run a real pilot (e.g. shadow run, run with a few agents, in an A/B test, etc.). If no success: no-go * Then hopefully in production within another 3 months. We're in a pretty regulated industry, most of this time is _not_ engineering. The phases help set priorities as well. Doesn't always make sense to spend (much) more time on scalability if we don't know it works yet.