3 ms·

Yeah, that's not remotely accurate. 45 angles for each pixel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EA2FQXs4dw&t=4m18s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EA2FQXs4dw&

• Miraste 6y ago
  Undoubtedly it's harder to build, but it is the same technology.
  • VikingCoder 6y ago
    Here's an article which discusses it, and it appears to explicitly not be lenticular. https://www.engineering.com/ARVR/ArticleID/17613/In-Through-the-Looking-Glass-Holographic-Startup-Wins-Big-on-Kickstarter.aspx https://www.engineering.com/ARVR/ArticleID/17613/In-Through-...
    • kaffeemitsahne 6y ago
      "There’s a lot more to the evolution, enough for a book on the subject, but if you had to create a list of what kinds of technology and methodology went into the Looking Glass (since they do not list it), it might look like this:" Pure speculation.
    • Miraste 6y ago
      That's not what that article says. It's speculation from before the display launched. Here is a later article in which the founder of the company says it is lenticular: https://hackaday.com/2018/11/21/supercon-alex-hornsteins-adventures-in-hacking-the-lightfield/ https://hackaday.com/2018/11/21/supercon-alex-hornsteins-adv... "since he happens to be head honcho at a holographic display company he can show us the result. Looking Glass Factory’s display panel uses a lenticular lens to combine the multiple images into a hologram, and is probably one of the most inexpensive ways to practically display this type of image."
• VikingCoder 6y ago
  I was wrong - Miraste shard an article where apparently the combining technology really is a lenticular lens.