4 ms·
That's my favourite explanation so far. That's how I would put it to the student: Yes, that's a perfectly correct operation. When you take 1/3 of the first tab
by Phlogistique 6y ago
That's my favourite explanation so far. That's how I would put it to the student:
Yes, that's a perfectly correct operation. When you take 1/3 of the first table and you put them toghether with 1/3 of the second table, you get 2/6 of both tables. However, that's not what mathematicians mean when they use the sign "+". Let's explain the difference with examples:
* At your table, Bob is 1/3 of the table, and Sandra is 1/3 of the table. Bob PLUS Sandra equals 2/3 of the table.
* Sandra is 1/3 of the table. Alice is 1/3 of the other table. When you put the two tables together, Alice and Sandra are 2/6 of both tables.
The first operation is what mathematicians call "+". They write "1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3"
The mathematicians do not have a good name for the second one, so let's invent one: "1/3 1/3 = 2/6"
What's better with this explanation, compared to the "ratios vs. fractions" thing, or the units thing, is that you do not have to introduce a separate category of numbers that sound very similar but act differently.
- wcarey 6y agoWe explicitly encourage the "let's invent name for this similar but unnamed thing" with our students, and use whatever name they come up with for the thing for the rest of their time with us. Sometimes those student created names become legendary. They really enjoy the idea that they can have "Jane's relation" be used by students after they graduate. (Of course, sometimes Jane's relation is really Euler's totient function, and we have to encourage them that even though they found something a very good mathematician also found, we're going to call it by the common name.)