4 ms·
Yeah, but you lose lots of HTML features—not even layout-related things, which of course aren't present in Markdown, but things like image captions, <abbr>, <ma
by karatestomp 6y ago
Yeah, but you lose lots of HTML features—not even layout-related things, which of course aren't present in Markdown, but things like image captions, <abbr>, <mark>, and so on. I love it for cases in which plain text would otherwise be used but it's lacking a lot of really nice features in HTML that aid readability and accessibility.
- justinmeiners 6y agoYou can define the image meta, but yes it sounds like HTML is good fit for your needs.
- steveklabnik 6y agoAny HTML is valid inside of Markdown, so you just write Markdown and then add HTML when it makes sense.