3 ms·
I love the general idea of this. It is a way of introducing a chat application that is not controlled by some single behemoth. It can take advantage of other pe
by chooseaname 6y ago
I love the general idea of this. It is a way of introducing a chat application that is not controlled by some single behemoth. It can take advantage of other people's servers (via email), so there's no real cost associated with it like there would be trying to stand up a server for handling nearly any other protocol. I'm just not sold on PGP. I don't see a point of this as long as metadata leaks.
I wonder if you could do the same, but use usenet. Most usenet providers allow encrypted connections to their servers... But then people would have to have a subscription to usenet.
- mimsee 6y agoAn alternative for this is Matrix. See: https://matrix.org https://matrix.org