3 ms·
While the trend is obvious, these types of super apps are neither desirable nor user centric. They are hot-spots of monopolies, censorship and are front-line e
by kumarvvr 6y ago
While the trend is obvious, these types of super apps are neither desirable nor user centric.
They are hot-spots of monopolies, censorship and are front-line enemies for democracies. Especially if they include social / news / events / groups stuff.
I wish, there are more apps, bound together with integration mechanisms (loosely coupled, high cohesion) rather than one super app.
Unfortunately, the whole world is moving towards super apps. Google / Amazon / FB / Apple are all doing Commerce / Banking / Products / Entertainment / Internet Services / Cloud Computing / News & Information / Social at the same time. (There may be some exceptions, like Apple not doing commerce like Amazon)
I guess business moves in circles. There was consolidation in times of Standard Oil (or steel, I don't recall), where controlling everything in every vertical is the game, then business moved towards a more distributed services type structures, then we are witnessing another round of consolidation.
Across all sectors, this is more pronounced in US, a handful of companies directly / indirectly control huge aspects of an individuals life.
Unfortunate.
- ramraj07 6y agoI'm in India now, and I don't see these super apps as monopolies , at least not yet. You can pay bills, recharge your mobiles and book tickets among other things using a bunch of super apps without any exclusive lock-in. The government did one good thing making a commoditized payment API enabling seamless transfer of money between services. Thus the apps compete on UX and fees and it really shows. Getting stuff done through my mobile in India is an order of magnitude less painful than anything I experienced in the US.