4 ms·
> It's pretty close. Imagine CNN has a report on the chances of Hillary and Donald in 2015. A few weeks later someone copies the stuff about Hillary's chances
by pmachinery 6y ago
> It's pretty close.
Imagine CNN has a report on the chances of Hillary and Donald in 2015. A few weeks later someone copies the stuff about Hillary's chances and makes no mention at all of Trump.
After the 2016 election they then edit their post to paste in the Trump stuff and use that new edit to claim they were writing about Trump's chances a year before the election.
Is that pretty close to the truth or is it virtually the complete opposite of the truth?
> But he contracted discussion of SARS and coronaviruses to "[An example]".
Not sure why you keep saying this. [An example] refers to the example that follows those words, about CDC labs, not an example that he specifically didn't mention.