4 ms·
That conclusion fundamentally invalidates your original conclusion, though. The problem isn't that "DHCPv6 is broken" but that you have a use case which a certa
by boomlinde 6y ago
That conclusion fundamentally invalidates your original conclusion, though. The problem isn't that "DHCPv6 is broken" but that you have a use case which a certain product someone wants to bring onto the network doesn't satisfy.
- corty 6y agoThe "product" is DHCPv6 and it doesn't solve the use case it is supposed to solve: managed networks and enterprises. As for random hardware and software products on the network: It would be nice for criteria like "proper IPv6 support" to be blockers, but they aren't for lack of choice. Almost no product out there has anything resembling proper IPv6 support. Just try some fresh deployment of anything in a IPv6-only network, I dare you :)
- Dagger2 6y agoI run my home desktop and many of my VMs as v6-only and almost everything works fine. There are a few things that have a problem (mostly games, for some reason), but not many. Though I could imagine "enterprise-grade" software, which often seems to be worse than open-source software, having similar problems.