3 ms·
It's not misquoting. It's poorly chosen words that were misleading. I too thought you meant you either replaced sscanf with a faster equivalent or used sscanf t
by ChrisLomont 6y ago
It's not misquoting. It's poorly chosen words that were misleading. I too thought you meant you either replaced sscanf with a faster equivalent or used sscanf to beat something else.
Instead write "I replaced sscanf with single use code", but then the speed improvement is not that interesting.
- underdeserver 6y agoDisagree that it's not interesting. It's just that the message is "sscanf is not necessarily the best tool for hot paths", not "sscanf is currently poorly written".