3 ms·
I’m confused why you aren’t voted up, this is an extremely accurate description that is pertinent to the story. To give our non-UK friends a bit more context (
by smcl 6y ago
I’m confused why you aren’t voted up, this is an extremely accurate description that is pertinent to the story.
To give our non-UK friends a bit more context (in case anyone thinks “flimsy excuses” is applying a bit of bias) he was caught going on a walk in a little town near his second home (itself a few hundred miles from where he probably should have been). His excuse was that he was feeling ill and had troubles with his eyesight so he decided to go for a (30 mile) drive to check ... I dunno, if he could see I guess? That thing you do when you have trouble with your eyesight, jump into a car and go for a drive.
Update: the “upvote” point was because your comment was greyed out, and after I upvoted you were still greyed out, suggesting you were fairly deep in the -ve at that point
- Cenk 6y agoNot only that, but the drive he took to “test his eye sight“ was with his wife and child in the car, they ended up driving to a local castle, and it happened to be on his wife’s birthday.
- Tenoke 6y agoIt's not very accurate given that he didn't break any law as the parent claimed. He went against a guidance.
- DangerousPie 6y agoHe said he drove with impaired eye sight, which violates the road traffic act.
- DanBC 6y agoHe broke section 6 of The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020, which is the law that implements the guidance.
- iso1631 6y agoA law that Cummings himself was involved in drafting.