5 ms·
defyccc spews climate change denialist propaganda. Why should I put more weight on an article from them than in The Lancet?
by twirlip 6y ago
defyccc spews climate change denialist propaganda. Why should I put more weight on an article from them than in The Lancet?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- lonelappde 6y agoBecause the Lancet has a bad reputation for publishing poor quality research: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/this-controversial-hydroxychloroquine-paper-whats-lancet-gonna-do-about-it/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/this-contr... Edit: I'm not saying denyccc is good! I'm pointing out that Lancet is bad too. Lancet has killed more people with its decade long defense of the Wakefield autism vaccine hoax than all the good it has done with its legitimate research.
- jakeogh 6y agoWeight? Is that like belief? Note the authors admit the data is unavailable.
- holler 6y agothat defyccc link was from a comment in the OP's post, there are other links from the same source site: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/24/doubts-about-that-article-claiming-that-hydroxychloroquine-chloroquine-is-killing-people/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/24/doubts-abo... https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/hydroxychloroquine-update/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/hydroxychl...