Yes, it would be very helpful to have the following numbers: 1) mortality rate 2) no symptom rate 3) negative outcome rate ->(some clear impact to patient who

Yes, it would be very helpful to have the following numbers: 1) mortality rate 2) no symptom rate 3) negative outcome rate ->(some clear impact to patient who has survived, but has life impacting effects) So if you find for example that within a population of 100000 people that you have 35% with no symptoms, and 0.26% died, then 64%+ had symptoms, so then how many people had symptoms that likely are long-lasting. If for example 10% of people had long lasting impacts, then that is a far greater number than 0.26%.. so before people say "look it ain't so bad".. then we need to understand that number before people invite 100 people over to their house party.