3 ms·

basically the most recent study of 96,000 people is alleged to be based on fabricated data... https://defyccc.com/anti-hcq-paper-in-the-lancet-uses-fabricated-

by holler 6y ago

basically the most recent study of 96,000 people is alleged to be based on fabricated data... https://defyccc.com/anti-hcq-paper-in-the-lancet-uses-fabricated-data/ https://defyccc.com/anti-hcq-paper-in-the-lancet-uses-fabric...

twirlip 6y ago
defyccc spews climate change denialist propaganda. Why should I put more weight on an article from them than in The Lancet?
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- lonelappde 6y ago
  Because the Lancet has a bad reputation for publishing poor quality research: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/this-controversial-hydroxychloroquine-paper-whats-lancet-gonna-do-about-it/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/this-contr... Edit: I'm not saying denyccc is good! I'm pointing out that Lancet is bad too. Lancet has killed more people with its decade long defense of the Wakefield autism vaccine hoax than all the good it has done with its legitimate research.
- jakeogh 6y ago
  Weight? Is that like belief? Note the authors admit the data is unavailable.
- holler 6y ago
  that defyccc link was from a comment in the OP's post, there are other links from the same source site: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/24/doubts-about-that-article-claiming-that-hydroxychloroquine-chloroquine-is-killing-people/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/24/doubts-abo... https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/hydroxychloroquine-update/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/hydroxychl...
lonelappde 6y ago
defyccc is barely this side of Alex Jones with their conspiracy theorizing absurd caricatures: They invented a theory that CO2 is called a "greenhouse gas" because farmers use CO2 in fertilizer, not because it increases temperature like a greenhouse and then without any source attribute that theory to climate scientists. https://defyccc.com/cult-of-climate-change/ https://defyccc.com/cult-of-climate-change/

by holler 6y ago

twirlip 6y ago

defyccc spews climate change denialist propaganda. Why should I put more weight on an article from them than in The Lancet?

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
lonelappde 6y ago
Because the Lancet has a bad reputation for publishing poor quality research: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/this-controversial-hydroxychloroquine-paper-whats-lancet-gonna-do-about-it/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/this-contr... Edit: I'm not saying denyccc is good! I'm pointing out that Lancet is bad too. Lancet has killed more people with its decade long defense of the Wakefield autism vaccine hoax than all the good it has done with its legitimate research.
jakeogh 6y ago
Weight? Is that like belief? Note the authors admit the data is unavailable.
holler 6y ago
that defyccc link was from a comment in the OP's post, there are other links from the same source site: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/24/doubts-about-that-article-claiming-that-hydroxychloroquine-chloroquine-is-killing-people/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/24/doubts-abo... https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/hydroxychloroquine-update/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/25/hydroxychl...

lonelappde 6y ago

defyccc is barely this side of Alex Jones with their conspiracy theorizing absurd caricatures: They invented a theory that CO2 is called a "greenhouse gas" because farmers use CO2 in fertilizer, not because it increases temperature like a greenhouse and then without any source attribute that theory to climate scientists. https://defyccc.com/cult-of-climate-change/ https://defyccc.com/cult-of-climate-change/