An interesting critique of the Lancet paper on HCQ is there[1]: whether you agree or not with it, it is worth a read, IMO. Also here[2] which tells that it was

An interesting critique of the Lancet paper on HCQ is there[1]: whether you agree or not with it, it is worth a read, IMO. Also here[2] which tells that it was given pretty late in treatment in most cases (again), hence where it was basically ineffective. Personally, since the Minnesota trial results are out soon, I think the WHO dropped the ball too early. Again, I have no interest in seeing HCQ succeed or fail, but I fail to see an answer to the actual question that the original Raoult paper asked. [1] https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1264251404232855552.html https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1264251404232855552.html [2] https://twitter.com/stevephillipsmd/status/1263899565654265857 https://twitter.com/stevephillipsmd/status/12638995656542658...