3 ms·
It can break down, but it's a damn good place start, especially if you don't have a good philosophy to replace it. Does it need stating how useful and powerful
by edderly 16y ago
It can break down, but it's a damn good place start, especially if you don't have a good philosophy to replace it.
Does it need stating how useful and powerful text based output can be?
- oskarkv 16y ago50-minute talk on simplicity (simple meaning not compound) as a place to start (and a little bit on Clojure): http://clojure.blip.tv/file/4824610/ http://clojure.blip.tv/file/4824610/