4 ms·
>Compare it with Youtube: the content which does well there is inflammatory by nature Except that Rogan's 3-hour-long interviews are massively popular on Youtu
by frank2 6y ago
>Compare it with Youtube: the content which does well there is inflammatory by nature
Except that Rogan's 3-hour-long interviews are massively popular on Youtube, which undermines your point. (The interviews include video.)
- skohan 6y agoBut Rogan's discovery mechanism on youtube is largely short clips of the most controversial or attention-grabbing moments from his long-form content. I would wager to guess that many of his youtube-only viewers probably learned about him from a short clip and went on to watch the full interview out of curiosity.