3 ms·
> there were a few that could led them to success which ones? If they tried 2 or 3 times with C++ and the Rust one succeeded, what other information would you
by leshow 6y ago
> there were a few that could led them to success
which ones? If they tried 2 or 3 times with C++ and the Rust one succeeded, what other information would you need to have to convince you that Rust was the differentiating factor? It seems like you just don't want to admit that Rust was the key to their success in the project, even when you have someone who was there telling you that it was.
We aren't going to get research study levels of replication on large projects like this, so I don't know what standard you're looking for here.
- chinesempire 6y ago> what other information would you need to have to convince you that Rust was the differentiating factor? The fact that Chrome is doing just fine without it? > t seems like you just don't want to admit that Rust was the key to their success in the projec It seems like you are trying a classic ad personam, I agree that Rust was one of the changing factor, I also wrote it, but just for Firefox, not in general. Which is the original point of this sub-thread. > We aren't going to get research study levels of replication on large projects like this I don't think Firefox is the only large project out there. nor the largest.