5 ms·
Apparently they've been friends for 30+ years. >At best it's lazy brohangs masquerading as journalism This is the problem: people coming to the podcast expect
by chance_state 6y ago
Apparently they've been friends for 30+ years.
>At best it's lazy brohangs masquerading as journalism
This is the problem: people coming to the podcast expecting it to be some intellectual journalistic endeavor, when Rogan has never promised anything of the kind. It's a bro-y meat head drinking and smoking weed with some guests. People take it way too seriously and impose their ideas of how Rogan should run his own show.
- giarc 6y agoBut with millions of viewers, does he not have some moral responsibility to question Jones' view that Sandy Hook was faked?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- banads 6y agoThat was the first thing he asked about.
- waheoo 6y agoI'm curious why you think he does? Im also curious why you think he didnt when i've seen that episode and he basically laughs in his face about it. You got the timestamp for this where he just lets alex run his mouth with unsubstantiated bullshit?
- Mediterraneo10 6y ago> This is the problem: people coming to the podcast expecting it to be some intellectual journalistic endeavor. This misconception is furthered by some of his fanbase (who apparently have never experienced actual high-level intellectual dialogue). I have repeatedly seen discontented young men contrast Rogan to content for women and claim that the latter is just vacuous cosmetics talk and gossip, while "Rogan is all about deep stuff like philosophy".
- DaniloDias 6y ago1) I don’t like stupid people 2) stupid people like ‘X’ 3) X should be banned.
- nprz 6y agoThat is absolutely a misrepresentation of the average JRE listener. Look at the youtube comments under any clip of the show and you'll see close to all are just making fun of Joe. Nearly every meme shared about the show is making fun of Joe's lack of intellectual rigor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKrf7mX_R6M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKrf7mX_R6M