18 ms·
Just to be clear, everyone agrees on the advantages of QC and no one disputes that Google has built a quantum computer. Let me try to paraphrase the arguments.
by vaidhy 6y ago
Just to be clear, everyone agrees on the advantages of QC and no one disputes that Google has built a quantum computer. Let me try to paraphrase the arguments.
1. QC needs qbits. 1 logical qbit needs many (tens to hundreds) of physical qbits.
2. We need Quantum Error Correction(QEC) to read cleanly from qbits. Current algorithms for QEC need about a 1000 logical qbits.
3. Current state of technology has only 50 - 200 qbits has very low signal to noise and the noise is inherent in the system (you cannot engineer it away)
4. The current systems, specifically Google’s, produce a sequence of numbers. It is possible to have a low complexity algorithm on classical computer which can produce similar sequences (i.e. pass the test for QC produced sequence)
4 is possible because reading from the qbits is noisy and such a noisy data can at best replicate a classical computer. So, the current state of the art, Noisy Intermediate State Quantum computers are not useful for any computation and we need to get to 1000+ qbits to achieve the supremacy. Of course, not everyone agrees that the noise cannot be engineered away or even if the noise is such a big deal.
- crazygringo 6y agoThank you! That's extremely helpful.