3 ms·
Yet, it happens so often, one would think it was OK. Like the Salisbury poisoning, where the victims were referred to as an 'ex-Russian spy', when he was reall
by Svip 6y ago
Yet, it happens so often, one would think it was OK. Like the Salisbury poisoning, where the victims were referred to as an 'ex-Russian spy', when he was really a 'Russian ex-spy'. Unfortunately, there are cases, where if one is true to form, it becomes rather a mouthful.
Unfortunately, I believe it is because what they mean to say is he is no longer the French President (as if 'French President' was a single term), and attach 'ex-' in front of that term. Similarly for the 'Russian spy', which apparently is also a single term, rather than two terms.
- philipov 6y agoThe correct way to handle it is to use the word "former" instead. "Former French President" parses correctly. "Ex-" binds tightly to the word in front of it because of the dash, but "former" allows "French President" to be the noun phrase being modified.