3 ms·
>I assume good faith, you asked for an exploit that works without precision timers to test, I provided one. No you didn't. You posted some code that doesn't do
by mahkoh 6y ago
>I assume good faith, you asked for an exploit that works without precision timers to test, I provided one.
No you didn't. You posted some code that doesn't do anything.
>I’m not sure what you were trying to prove, but you can’t tell people to prove you wrong
I didn't ask anyone to prove me wrong. I asked georgyo to prove his claim that an exploit is possible. You chimed in and posted some nonsense code which obviously does nothing and never did anything even before Meltdown and Specter were mitigated anywhere because even the original native PoC's were much more complicated.
>A “fully working” exploit for the most modern browser is probably possible frankly
Stop talking out of your ass.
- dijit 6y agoI will not respond to such hostile comments other than to say: 1) I posted content which can be used to check the vulnerability of browsers, like you asked. 2) Requiring a specific user "prove you wrong" on a public forum is not conducive to a healthy discussion. It looks more like baiting and bullying. 3) The fact that it did not work does not mean that there is no future repercussions for this class of issues affecting browsers. I will not resort to saying that you're "talking out of your ass", but I will outwardly accuse you of discussing this topic in bad faith.
- dang 6y agoYou broke the site guidelines badly here. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and sticking to the rules when posting here, we'd be grateful.