Thanks for catching that. I don't really understand why they are using numbers from one table and not the other. I guess, it may be related to the dates they

Thanks for catching that. I don't really understand why they are using numbers from one table and not the other. I guess, it may be related to the dates they conducted the seroprevalence study, but it's only a wild guess. I'll try to look through the documents more carefully later, maybe there's an explanation.