3 ms·
Looks fascinating. I wish that in the first section, they would have shown which instructions (for a sample architecture) might have been generated for each app
by alexdowad 6y ago
Looks fascinating. I wish that in the first section, they would have shown which instructions (for a sample architecture) might have been generated for each application of the tree rewrite rules. It looks like the reader was expected to understand that as a prerequisite.
It seems the authors' interest was more on how using their code generation tables could speed up the application of those tree rewrite rules.
- emmanueloga_ 6y agoIt just blows my mind that an "Artifact Evaluation" process wasn't proposed until so recently [1]. "A paper consists of a constellation of artifacts that extend beyond the document itself: software, proofs, models, test suites, benchmarks, and so on. In some cases, the quality of these artifacts is as important as that of the document itself, yet our conferences offer no formal means to submit and evaluate anything but the paper." 1: https://www.artifact-eval.org/about.html https://www.artifact-eval.org/about.html