3 ms·
We spent about 6 months looking at pretty much every database tech on the market, cockroach, clickhouse, influx, voltdb, memsql etc were top contenders, there w
by quade1664 6y ago
We spent about 6 months looking at pretty much every database tech on the market, cockroach, clickhouse, influx, voltdb, memsql etc were top contenders, there was an outdated article on medium.com (by victoria metrics) which slammed TimescaleDB for its disk usage, we did not realised it was biased, so we dropped TSDB dropped off the list, but we saw a email about their compression segment by device_id, and gave it a shot, ....we implemented it, 5 months after our production release we now have outstanding performance and compression (95x)
We are planning to move the rest of our databases to TSDB now as it ticks our boxes our use case is HTAP, not solely OLAP and OLTP
I'm super excited about this news, but TSDB please work on allowing us to put data over 1 year old on slow disk seperate servers, so we can keep the hot stuff on the NVME servers, once you get this sorted it will be the perfect fit for us.
- akulkarni 6y agoGlad to hear it is working out for you! I'll relay the request re: old data. But please also feel free to email me directly at ajay (at) timescale.com (or email support (at) timescale.com) if you have any follow up questions / requests.
- akulkarni 6y agoGood news: TimescaleDB already offers this feature. Feel free to ping us support (at) timescale.com and we can walk you through it. Thanks!
- hodgesrm 6y ago> TSDB please work on allowing us to put data over 1 year old on slow disk seperate servers, so we can keep the hot stuff on the NVME servers, once you get this sorted it will be the perfect fit for us. ClickHouse recently added multi-volume storage for exactly the use case you describe. [1] It's a great feature. [1] https://www.altinity.com/blog/2019/11/27/amplifying-clickhouse-capacity-with-multi-volume-storage-part-1 https://www.altinity.com/blog/2019/11/27/amplifying-clickhou...