4 ms·
Yeah. It's based on work site, but they define down to the county what the location adjustment is. But the same thing could be used for remote workers. I strong
by lykr0n 6y ago
Yeah. It's based on work site, but they define down to the county what the location adjustment is. But the same thing could be used for remote workers. I strongly assume the remote work positions that exist would pay based on the county where the worker resides.
If these large tech companies just used the US GS Scale's locality adjustment, it would be super easy and non-controversial.
https://www.federalpay.org/gs/locality https://www.federalpay.org/gs/locality
- dragonwriter 6y ago> But the same thing could be used for remote workers. It wouldn't be the same thing if it wasn't based on job-required worksite. They don't pay you based on where you live (which is quite often a different county than the work site), but where you are assigned to work. If you have no assigned worksite, as is the case with remote work, there'd be no basis for the adjustment. > If these large tech companies just used the US GS Scale's locality adjustment, it would be super easy and non-controversial. Super easy, yes. Non-controversial, no.
- throwaway4715 6y agoSure. If you're working from home your work site is where you live.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> Sure. If you're working from home your work site is where you live. Unless your employer assigns your residence, it's not a difference in job duty.you are being paid for, so is not analogous to being paid for employer-assogned job site when analyzing disparate impact.