3 ms·
I must admit I skimmed the post the first time :). I too have run a book group for the last few years, and we've toyed with this idea several times. The advanta
by tdeck 6y ago
I must admit I skimmed the post the first time :). I too have run a book group for the last few years, and we've toyed with this idea several times. The advantages are clear in terms of not having to hit a tough deadline, and being able to tackle longer books. I think it can work with anthologies of short stories and essays, but for longer narrative works I wonder about the following (perhaps you can provide some insight):
- Will new people be willing to join in the middle of a book?
- If people don't like the book, do they just have to stick around for the next N meetings? If not, does it lose its place in their routine causing them to forget about it?
I think these concerns may be specific to more "open-access" book groups that anyone can join, rather than long-running groups of existing friends.
- kickscondor 6y agoOne way my group has done this is to tackle an author or a series together - that way we have some common ground in our reading. However, if you’re doing it long-term, I much prefer just talking about what you’re reading right now. Over time, you will start to read each other’s recommendations and the discussion will catch up. I’m sure there are a lot of ways to do this. (OH and it’s awesome that you fessed up about skimming the article - I am there with you the rest of the time. :D)