This has only been occasionally available in my experience, and itself introduces perhaps worse problems. If I'm explicitly arguing against someone's theory, th

This has only been occasionally available in my experience, and itself introduces perhaps worse problems. If I'm explicitly arguing against someone's theory, they are likely to be a relevant judge of the merits/demerits of the arguments. Having a good editor who can discern the difference between a reviewer's relevant responses and 'turf warfare' is probably best one can wish for.