8 ms·
I think you touched upon a good topic. I feel Jerks tend to be people with little empathy for peoples feelings and high affinity for reality and the truth at t
by crimsonalucard1 6y ago
I think you touched upon a good topic.
I feel Jerks tend to be people with little empathy for peoples feelings and high affinity for reality and the truth at the expense of everyones emotions.
While most people don't officially define a "Jerk" with the definition above, I feel that the personalities most people perceive as Jerks fit the definition above perfectly.
It's just people are unable to see past the "lack of empathy." They are unable to see that the while some actions lack empathy, they are also in line with truth and reality.
That is the ultimate question... What kind of company do you want to build or work for. Do you want a company full of yes men and people who respect others? Do you want a company where people lack respect and lay the god awful truth on the table? Or do you want something in between?
I feel to get something in between you need a few Jerks within the organization.
- golemotron 6y agoPeople want to get rid of the bad while forgetting that good leaves along with it too.
- dependenttypes 6y agoI though that most people equate "jerk" with "asshole" rather. If it is as you said however then I would rather hire solely jerks.
- dhimes 6y agoI think I can add to your observation: The difference between a good leader and a jerk can come down to ego. A good leader may have to make a decision despite hurting feelings and enduring bad emotions, but will make the decision based on the right path even if they suffer too. Jerks will make decisions that upset others but will go to the mat to defend their own feelings and emotions. For jerks, it's not "anything to make this happen." It's "anything to make me happen."