3 ms·
There's one thing to be offering these services but another thing to ban competition in the same areas. Even worse, the monopoly is justified in the name of 'na
by iwwr 16y ago
There's one thing to be offering these services but another thing to ban competition in the same areas. Even worse, the monopoly is justified in the name of 'natural monopoly', yet there is still the need to legislate this monopoly (as if nature needed any encouragement).
Furthermore, as soon as you get a local monopoly on internet access, you are only one city council decision away from local censorship. After all, he who pays gets to call the shots ("Porn on the tax-paid internet? No way! Think of the children.")
- jellicle 16y ago> There's one thing to be offering these services but another thing to ban competition in the same areas. You are aware that this article is about a bill, written by Time-Warner, to ban municipalities from competing with them, right?