2 ms·
This... usually happens on Jepsen HN threads. The full title, as in the page metadata, and as originally submitted, is "Jepsen: MongoDB 4.2.6. At some point a m
by aphyr 6y ago
This... usually happens on Jepsen HN threads. The full title, as in the page metadata, and as originally submitted, is "Jepsen: MongoDB 4.2.6. At some point a mod drops the "Jepsen:" part, then we have this discussion, and it comes back. :)
"Why don't you put Jepsen:" on the same line as the database name and version?"
Space concerns, and also, it's immediately above the DB name in giant letters.
"Why don't you give them more creative names?"
Clients love to argue about the titles of these analyses; having a concise, predictable policy for titling is how I get past those discussions.
- fastball 6y agoAs another commenter pointed out, it might be worth making the titles "An evaluation of X" going forward – better for HN and probably better everywhere else this is shared too.
- aphyr 6y agoNot sure how many ways I can say this: the titles are already "Jepsen: X". HN's got a policy in place that means sometimes mods change the title to just "X". That's not something I have control over, sorry.