3 ms·

>If I'm the customer: yes Well of you enjoy that restaurant you shouldn't be ok with it, because with price margins like you describe, that restaurant's not go

• deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
• matz1 6y ago
  I am specifically discussing about comparing net price, nothing to do with price margin though.
  • mint2 6y ago
    Why are you limiting your consideration to such and artificial and limited scope? No one else is going to object if you consider whether a wallet vote is pretty blatantly encouraging and rewarding exploitive behavior. It’s very hard to pretend the relationship is not exploitative.
    • matz1 6y ago
      The price of the item is real for me. Limited scope? Sure, its for my benefit and my convinience.
• dwild 6y ago
  > Well of you enjoy that restaurant you shouldn't be ok with it, because with price margins like you describe, that restaurant's not going to exist for very long. That's only true in a vacuum though. There's so much more variable that makes it absurd to happen, except if we live in some kind of tv show. Let say Uber eat charge too much and it kill their customer, will they keep doing it? Why would they? Theses customers are the one bringiner them this cash. Why would no competitor see that and decide to charge 1% less? That would be absurd for the restaurant not to consider that one instead. That strategy would be incredibly easy to apply locally too. Let's not forget that restaurant still can have their own delivery drivers too, like in the article we are talking about right now. That also means that you will have to pay for the marketing too that the delivery service provided for you beforehands... but that's normal business.