3 ms·
I talked with someone in food manufacturing who mentioned the NIST guidelines for "did you short fill to your stated quantity" are more lax if you have variabil
by DavidPeiffer 6y ago
I talked with someone in food manufacturing who mentioned the NIST guidelines for "did you short fill to your stated quantity" are more lax if you have variability in the size of the pieces. With well calibrated measurement devices, you could slightly short fill and but be totally legal. I'm looking for the specific formula they use to determine this, but my Google-fu is a bit lacking on this one.
I talked with another person who was at a meat packing plant. At the end of the manufacturing line for ground beef, there was a little machine which would extrude a tiny string of ground beef. The weight was precisely measured, a prescribed amount was added to get it to its required package weight, then it was packaged. He said the plant ran on ~3% profit margin, so they went quite far down the praeto of cost saving ideas.
I also know of an intern at Proctor & Gamble who noticed an overfilling of mouthwash. With the volumes they ran, they had annual savings of hundreds of thousands of dollars by better calibrating things.
- extrapickles 6y agoLast I checked, net-weighted (not individually weighed) meat has to be at or above indicated weight. This means slightly overfilling because of moisture loss, as they still have to make package weight on the last day the product is still good. Non-meats can be slightly under-filled but the running average must be at weight (this can be gamed slightly with good equipment).
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]