4 ms·
Seriously, why doesn't python have a maven equivalent yet? And no fat-binaries. Nor self executing binaries. It's just as old and having em basically just boil
by 411111111111111 6y ago
Seriously, why doesn't python have a maven equivalent yet?
And no fat-binaries. Nor self executing binaries. It's just as old and having em basically just boils down to enforcing conventions. But nope, nothing. There have been attempts by some such as shiv, but really... None are even remotely as usable as maven is.
- dnautics 6y agoYou could containerize your python. That's like having a fat binary.
- 411111111111111 6y agoyes, you can do that. I've been doing that for around 8 years now. And no, it's not the same. Not even remotely. The only thing that helps with are quick and easy deployments. The thing which makes maven special is the ease of producing artefacts for deployments, not the final step of starting it up on the server.
- roguas 6y agoPython doesn't require creating artifacts. It requires dependency resolvement which Docker is perfect for.
- jonnytran 6y agoHave you tried Nuitka? https://github.com/Nuitka/Nuitka https://github.com/Nuitka/Nuitka
- RMPR 6y agoIn the same vein there's also PyInstaller and PyOxidizer, not to mention platform-specific binaries generators (Py2app, ...)
- RMPR 6y agoPyInstaller Nuitka PyOxidizer To name a few.