2 ms·
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Affirming-the-Consequent https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Affirmi... You've also treat
by vorpalhex 6y ago
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Affirming-the-Consequent https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Affirmi...
You've also treated two unrelated statements as dependent clauses.
- _emacsomancer_ 6y agoI know enough logic not to need your links, thank you. And, no, my point was that you have tried to relate, in a hand-wavy fashion, two unrelated statements. So you can't say "it's for the same reason".