3 ms·
Yeah your comments were not clear. But the reply comment to you made a great point (that you actually acknowledged, but don't seem to understand underlies why y
by WoodenChair 6y ago
Yeah your comments were not clear. But the reply comment to you made a great point (that you actually acknowledged, but don't seem to understand underlies why your point is problematic): NNW is free (in both senses of the word) and open source software. Brent and the team are not being paid to work on it. They are using a third party service (Feedly) as a backing store. You have the option of paying for it, or you have the option of not paying for it. Either way, if your argument is that NNW lacks a syncing feature you are wrong. And if your argument is that the syncing feature (Feedly) should be free, then your argument effectively boils down to "hey people who did this awesome free software, please make more free software for me." Which is not a strong argument.
- webwanderings 6y agoHere, someone left this(1) link above. This is a better practical response than just trying to win an argument for the sake of winning an argument. https://github.com/Ranchero-Software/NetNewsWire/issues/491 https://github.com/Ranchero-Software/NetNewsWire/issues/491