4 ms·
The vaguely "caucasoid" appearance they have is generally theorized as the result of either (or a combination of) two things: 1. A relatively recent (past ~20k
by KhoomeiK 6y ago
The vaguely "caucasoid" appearance they have is generally theorized as the result of either (or a combination of) two things:
1. A relatively recent (past ~20k years) migration from Central Siberia correlated with the Ancestral North Eurasians [1], who contributed significant ancestry to Amerindians, Europeans, and Central/South Asians. They were phenotypically intermediate between modern East and West Eurasians, hence the unique combination of features often found in Amerindians.
2. A remnant of a much earlier (~50k years) population descended from humans who took the Southern Route [2] across Eurasia. They contributed significant ancestry to the Australian Aboriginals, certain South and Southeast Asian populations, and potentially some groups in the Amazon. The ancestry contributed to those Amerindians in the Amazon would've had to come from this population coming up across East Eurasia, where they could've left behind (or contributed to) populations like the Ainu.
West Eurasians (Caucasoids) and South Eurasians (Australoids) share a few distinctive traits that are shared by the Ainu, notably prominent brow ridges, lack of epicanthic folds, and heavier facial hair. So purely from a phenotypic point of view it's difficult to determine their origin. Genomic analyses also tend to be inconclusive, with Ainu often clustering with other Siberian groups rather than some special outgroup.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_North_Eurasian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_North_Eurasian
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Dispersal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Dispersal
- person_of_color 6y agoReminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalash_people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalash_people
- qq11ww22ee33 6y agoSure is great to see some phrenology early on a sunday morning
- wnoise 6y agoWhat was the need for this sneering comment? This isn't phrenology in the racist and pseudoscientific sense at all. It's not even trying to correlate anthropometrics. The Ainu are actually a distinct people, and noticing the readily apparent distinctions between the Ainu people and the other inhabitants of the Japanese islands is no more racist than noting that African peoples tend to have darker skin than Europeans. Erasing distinctions rather than recording them does nothing more than making it easier to erase genocide from the historical record.