3 ms·
Next step will be, "Verizon has no obligation to be anyone's loudspeaker". No one is obliged to be anything to anyone if you put it that way, but then there's t
by orestarod 6y ago
Next step will be, "Verizon has no obligation to be anyone's loudspeaker". No one is obliged to be anything to anyone if you put it that way, but then there's this thing called discrimination that goes counter to that - it expects a VERY GOOD reason to deny service to someone. "I have no obligation to sell to blacks", for example, does not stand. "I have no obligation to hosts anyone's word when I don't agree with that they say" stands? Perhaps we should get a list of all the things we are allowed to say and stop communicating through the internet altogether, as the list will have every information we will ever need to access.
- mitchdoogle 6y agoStopping the spread of harmful misinformation is a VERY GOOD reason to deny service to someone.
- AstralStorm 6y agoWho decides what is disinformation? A politburo in Google? Some high office in the USA? I understand if they give a safebrowsing warning that the document contains potential misinformation, like for sites with potential malware. Blocking is not the right way to solve it. Censorship is always abused, in the end.