This is of course an interesting point that would satisfy curiosity. But if we are to accept the author’s central claim that it was reviewed and accepted by hu

This is of course an interesting point that would satisfy curiosity. But if we are to accept the author’s central claim that it was reviewed and accepted by humans many times in these two years, the why isn’t really important. IMO it would just make the story more interesting, not critically different. Now if you have reason to think that central claim is bullshit that’s another question. PS: also in this types of automated triggers, getting to know what triggered the warnings is in itself a pretty hard task. I think a number of extensions just get removed without ever knowing exactly why it happened.