4 ms·

Feedly is limited with free account. The point I'm making is that NNW should be using its own service to maintain user's "read" states between its desktop and m

Feedly is limited with free account. The point I'm making is that NNW should be using its own service to maintain user's "read" states between its desktop and mobile apps. I'm not a big innoreader fan but their mobile app is decent and their online service is synced together. In this case, I never have to worry about my "read" states getting out of sync. When it comes to RSS adoption, the read-state needs to be seamless across all platforms.

solidsnack9000 6y ago
It seems like you are saying, you should get this great use case handled for you, and not have to pay for anything: not for the app or for the service.
- webwanderings 6y ago
  Is that what you read in two of my messages above? Interesting! BTW, NNW is not charging as of yet. What I was talking about in two of my messages above, is the adoption issue with disparate platforms without the availability of read-state feature. If I use NNW mobile, I'm bound to using it all the time (which is not practical). If I use it's desktop app, I'm bound to using it on my Mac all the time (again, not practical). Anyone with more than hundred or more feeds, would find issues adopting such service. I am not here to defend my likeness of NNW so I won't say anything in this regard.
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
  - WoodenChair 6y ago
    Yeah your comments were not clear. But the reply comment to you made a great point (that you actually acknowledged, but don't seem to understand underlies why your point is problematic): NNW is free (in both senses of the word) and open source software. Brent and the team are not being paid to work on it. They are using a third party service (Feedly) as a backing store. You have the option of paying for it, or you have the option of not paying for it. Either way, if your argument is that NNW lacks a syncing feature you are wrong. And if your argument is that the syncing feature (Feedly) should be free, then your argument effectively boils down to "hey people who did this awesome free software, please make more free software for me." Which is not a strong argument.
    - webwanderings 6y ago
      Here, someone left this(1) link above. This is a better practical response than just trying to win an argument for the sake of winning an argument. https://github.com/Ranchero-Software/NetNewsWire/issues/491 https://github.com/Ranchero-Software/NetNewsWire/issues/491

solidsnack9000 6y ago

It seems like you are saying, you should get this great use case handled for you, and not have to pay for anything: not for the app or for the service.

webwanderings 6y ago
Is that what you read in two of my messages above? Interesting! BTW, NNW is not charging as of yet. What I was talking about in two of my messages above, is the adoption issue with disparate platforms without the availability of read-state feature. If I use NNW mobile, I'm bound to using it all the time (which is not practical). If I use it's desktop app, I'm bound to using it on my Mac all the time (again, not practical). Anyone with more than hundred or more feeds, would find issues adopting such service. I am not here to defend my likeness of NNW so I won't say anything in this regard.
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- WoodenChair 6y ago
  Yeah your comments were not clear. But the reply comment to you made a great point (that you actually acknowledged, but don't seem to understand underlies why your point is problematic): NNW is free (in both senses of the word) and open source software. Brent and the team are not being paid to work on it. They are using a third party service (Feedly) as a backing store. You have the option of paying for it, or you have the option of not paying for it. Either way, if your argument is that NNW lacks a syncing feature you are wrong. And if your argument is that the syncing feature (Feedly) should be free, then your argument effectively boils down to "hey people who did this awesome free software, please make more free software for me." Which is not a strong argument.
  - webwanderings 6y ago
    Here, someone left this(1) link above. This is a better practical response than just trying to win an argument for the sake of winning an argument. https://github.com/Ranchero-Software/NetNewsWire/issues/491 https://github.com/Ranchero-Software/NetNewsWire/issues/491