Thanks. That's so interesting. I couldn't think of any legal reason to support the suit, since parties to a "mineral rights" contract are obviously thinking in

Thanks. That's so interesting. I couldn't think of any legal reason to support the suit, since parties to a "mineral rights" contract are obviously thinking in terms of mining, and a valid contract must involve a "meeting of the minds." But it seems as though to some judges the words of the contract matter more than the parties' intents.