4 ms·
One thing I've noticed is that there are a lot of automated decision making going on. In [1], the ICO offers guidance around what the GDPR says in regards to th
by aboringusername 6y ago
One thing I've noticed is that there are a lot of automated decision making going on. In [1], the ICO offers guidance around what the GDPR says in regards to this subject.
What I don't understand is why the GDPR doesn't enforce the following:
1: Clear and concise information about the action being taken, and clear identification this was done using automation and did not involve any human oversight.
2: A process the user can invoke to request human intervention, and a confirmation email that a human will review the decision that was made within 30 days
3: Public statistics and transparency - any decision that was made that did not involve a human must be published, with stats on % of decisions made, number of cases flagged to human reviewers, and the success/failure rates (for example, number of cases resulting in an overturned AI decision by a human).
This could also be beneficial in other sectors too, like automated credit decisions and insurance policies, to publish statistics and data to afford transparency and identify possible biases. It should also be a requirement in law to preserve any code or algorithms should they need to be audited, including an AI system to be preserved "in time", so that the 2017 version can be audited in 2020 if an investigation is launched for example.
Right now, it's a complete free for all, too many edge cases and ways to game the system if you can figure its loopholes, and no requirement in law to provide a fair basis for users to appeal to a human without causing a PR shitstorm.
This early adoption of AI is quite bad, and I suspect we'll see such developments in the long term future as it matures.
[1]: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/automated-decision-making-and-profiling/what-does-the-gdpr-say-about-automated-decision-making-and-profiling/ https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protectio...
- 5h 6y agoLiterally the first sentence of the GDPR: This Regulation lays down rules relating to the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and rules relating to the free movement of personal data. No snark, this situation sucks, but after dealing with GDPR for a while it's not well understood in tech societies
- aboringusername 6y agoI think what's needed is case studies or case law. A ruling in a court that becomes a "model" as to which the GDPR is applied. People look at historic court cases which defines future societal behavior (like acceptance of Gay marriage in some places). It'll take time but get there eventually, and then we'll see changes based on that.