6 ms·

So you think it's great they don't have to depend on anyone else, but that they should still for some reason be interested in someone who, by your own admission

So you think it's great they don't have to depend on anyone else, but that they should still for some reason be interested in someone who, by your own admission, doesn't have a clue about "that industry" and has nothing at all to offer to "get shit done" (whatever that is supposed to mean)? And you're confused why these people already making lots of money by and for themselves aren't interested in yet another random guy selflessly offering to "help" them, and think it can only be the fault of "creeps" (people more likely to be supporting the performers, and not just looking to make money off their backs)?

khazhoux 6y ago
Why the harsh tone? There was nothing contradictory is his/her statement.
- pmachinery 6y ago
  > Why the harsh tone? It wasn't intended to be harsh, simply a case of 'come on dude, think about it'. These performers will be swamped by offers of "help" every day from people charitably wanting to get in on their act. The people who matter to the performers are the supporters/fans the poster (harshly) dismisses as "creeps". > There was nothing contradictory is his/her statement. Without wanting to repeat myself, their first sentence is about how great they think it is performers/models don't need anyone else, and the rest is annoyance and refusal to accept that that includes him/her.