4 ms·
Sounds like a hellhole. That policy is perfectly tailored for corruption and paranoia.
by Igelau 6y ago
Sounds like a hellhole. That policy is perfectly tailored for corruption and paranoia.
- gruez 6y ago> That policy is perfectly tailored for corruption Elaborate?
- fargle 6y agoconcur. I do hope that the "well meaning" security team that thought this up is diligent in investigating and accounting for false positives. "Oh, I clicked the link in the fishing email IN A VM to see what the F* it was" and "I entered 'fakeceo' and 'mrpassword123'". People have different methods of exploring and learning to decide if something is legit or not. Nor should any "security policy" should be a 3 strikes zero tolerance policy. Everything needs context. P.S. I'm pretty sure that the mental and behavioral damage done by this 3 strikes policy can easily be weaponized. Shame.
- blntechie 6y agoThat’s the cost of client enforced security policy. I have not known or heard anyone personally fired for this but definitely getting warnings and or getting reassigned their roles.