>Lying for the sake of truth is a bad idea. This isn't lying, it's accurate according to the information that we have acquired over the last 60 years on the us

>Lying for the sake of truth is a bad idea. This isn't lying, it's accurate according to the information that we have acquired over the last 60 years on the use of nuclear technology. Should these predictions turn out to be incorrect then the information we have needs to be updated. I'm hoping it turns out well, there are of course no guarantees but the chances of things going even further south are low.