3 ms·
It should never have been signed off on by an IRB. It is irresponsible and horrific that this has been trialed on people in this century.
by lvs 6y ago
It should never have been signed off on by an IRB. It is irresponsible and horrific that this has been trialed on people in this century.
- ianai 6y agoAny specific objections to the research links provided?
- skmurphy 6y agoI suspect this may be a case of "the dose makes the poison." You may be generalizing from a specific experience or specific experiment and rejecting a modality that may have significant efficacy. It's hard to tell what you are basing your assertions on because you offer no specifics. My "watch list" interest is based on the number of positive experimental results and ongoing investigations of the technique.