3 ms·
Neither are bad. A private company can refuse service to a problematic customer violating their TOS. Google is under no obligation to provide free services to l
by hootbootscoot 6y ago
Neither are bad. A private company can refuse service to a problematic customer violating their TOS.
Google is under no obligation to provide free services to liars who are intent upon stirring up trouble.
Think of how many bars ban problematic ex-clientele.
The WaPo is acting in the public interest, for once in their miserable life.
These Plandemic fans are a public health menace, give them no quarter.
Oh, as to the troublemakers: knock it off at once.
this is serious.