I might be wrong about this but if you're running a shebang'd script directly as an executable, they wouldn't need to modify the behavior of the shell itself bu

I might be wrong about this but if you're running a shebang'd script directly as an executable, they wouldn't need to modify the behavior of the shell itself but rather the executable loader. It would be interesting to see whether, e.g., `bash test.sh` doesn't phone home where "./test.sh" does.